Shoes Under £100: Not the Best, but not Half Bad for the Price

Advertisement

“Men should never wear cheap shoes” read a post on a famous retailer’s Facebook page. A sensible notion, but more easily said than done. It is true that buying cheap shoes is often a mistake. Shoes need to be of high-quality materials and construction; while a £25 pair might seem like a bargain, they probably won’t even last a year of wear. Suitably, such shoes are decried as horrors; blasphemy against footwear.

The resulting dogma from the footwear illuminati is that you should spend as much money on your shoes as you can. The popular men’s forum pages are full of praise for brands such as John Lobb, Edward Green and Crockett & Jones; arguably the most elite footwear brands in the world. If you were a first time visitor, you would think, from all the high-horsed posturing, that other shoe manufacturers were not only less desirable but also absurdly embarrassing.

Great brands such as Loake and Barker are pulled apart for having leather of “an inferior grain”; as soon as someone has positively introduced a challenger brand, the guns of JL, EG and CJ are wheeled out – with acronymical affection – to deny not only the challenge but also the existence of these other brands; as if it was an acknowledged truth that every man is able to afford £300-£400 shoes.

I was recently asked by a friend if I could recommend somewhere to buy shoes for under £100. An educated professional working and living in London, he pays some of the highest rent in the world from a salary which has been frozen for the last few years. “There are some great shoes in the sale for about £190-£250” I say “they’ll last you years.” Sadly out of his range; £100 is the absolute maximum. “I’d prefer around £50-60. I’m absolutely broke.”

It is easy for enthusiasts to dismiss the penury of others and their decision not to spend great sums on footwear. For as many wealthy buyers as there are, packing in the Northampton shoes, there are hard-up fanatics who save consistently for such items. It is important to remember that this is a rather warped world, not the real world. I like being a style enthusiast but I would hate to think I was spending more on adding to my wardrobe than saving for my future. Hobbyists are useful to non-hobbyists because they manage to find the best through their hobby. However, hobby guides for the majority become less useful when they assume the same preparedness for expenditure. Which of us would listen to a Hifi enthusiast who says if we don’t spend our month’s wages on an obscure sounding set of speakers, our life isn’t worth living?

I recently bought, and returned, a pair of shoes from Jones The Bootmaker – a brand that most daren’t even mention on the popular forums. Bought because of their exceptional value – £55, reduced from £120 – and returned because they did not fit with a proper sock on. However, I directed my hard-up friend to the store for their excellent sale. “Are these shoes good?” he asked nervously. “They’re not the best” I responded, truthfully “but they’re not half bad for the price.” It’s easy to forget that this is the way most of us are forced to approach purchases in life; even those with more than a passing interest in style.


Advertisement

Winston Chesterfield is an amateur composer, fashion blogger, trained lawyer and style aficionado. He lives in Westminster, London and blogs at www.levraiwinston.com.

Comments

  1. Laurence says:

    Never a truer word.
    Loake and Barker seem to constantly come in for a hard time on the various fashion forums, where people all seem to wear Edward Green shoes everyday but rarely walk anywhere in them.

    BTW, Herring still have a few shoes just under the magic £100.00 mark.

  2. Blessings says:

    When I first lived outside of London I began my foray into better shoes at Jone’s. To be honest I believe that for the money they are some of the best shoes you can buy. As a poor student at the time there was no other place where I could find a nice captoe boot or suede single buckle monkstrap for under 80 quid (on the sale rack) I still have both pairs 8 and 6 years down the line.

    When I was able to I upgraded to Loake, Barker, and a single pair of Crockett and Jones.

    For the money Jones makes a shoe far superb to most other offerings in their price bracket. Sadly I was only able to realise this once I moved to the USA, where $80 will buy you a piece of plastic penny loafer.

  3. Miami Mike says:

    Sometimes you get lucky indeed. There’s an upscale used clothing store near me, and someone in the area buys really good quality shoes in exactly my size, wears them a week or so, and donates them. I’ve gotten four pair of shoes (so far), they look and feel just like new, for about $6 a pair – yes, six dollars a pair. The last pair was a pair of Barrie oxfords, the pair before that was a pair of Nunn Bush (not quite as good, but still OK) cordovan loafers (like penny mocs). Luck isn’t a strategy, but I’ll take it.

  4. James says:

    A well-written and considered piece, Winston. Like many other readers I look to bloggers such as you to provide information, inspiration and amusement, whist thinking ‘if only I had that level of disposable income…..I would be one of those clothing hobbyists’ – and I’m no longer a penurous student (nor have I been for more that 2 decades!) So refreshing to read a bit of a more ‘real world’ perspective. But damn me I would love a pair of JLs, EGs or CJs. Or even, God permitting, some GCs ;-)

  5. ross says:

    Just suck it up and pay the $400 CJ each and get 3 pair, $1200 2 black 1 brown, maybe a some tux shoes if you are so inclined.

    I don’t mind spending on shoes, especially when they wear and age well (and they are fixable), unlike suits- which I hate buying. Why? it went from 2 button with pleats to 3 and slim with no pleats, then back to 2 with with a super short jacket and slim lapels to….. you get the picture. All for $1000+++ each, dry clean em a couple times and off to goodwill. Or you get that great trainer, and loose 10lbs fat gain a couple pounds muscle, or gain 20, either way the suit is done, chuck it.

    shoes- you could rock grey 80′s gucci loafers with gold bits and get away with it. (extreme but you get my point) Try that with a 80′s waiter waist jacket and pants with 60 million pleats.

    Boo on suits and ties.