Putting Waistcoats into Practice
Someone commented to me recently that I wasn’t living by my waistcoat theory (see postings on January 16 and 18). Given that Men’s Flair is “men’s style as seen by those living it” this is probably a fair criticism.
The waistcoat theory suggested that modern air conditioning meant a waistcoat and trousers would be the work attire most in line with traditional menswear. As men never wear a jacket around the office, the beneficial effects of a suit are almost entirely lost. A waistcoat, on the other hand, retains the shape and elongation of a suit while being comfortable for work at a computer and not too warm for an office with central heating.
This was meant as a theory more than anything else – to make a point about how a suit, despite all the time people spend thinking about it or having it made, is actually worn. But it wouldn’t be much of a theory if it was never put tried in practice.
So today I opted for a grey flannel waistcoat and trousers (two pieces from a three-piece Ralph Lauren suit), dark brown derby shoes from Richard James, and blue shirt and dark blue tie.
One tip: both waistcoat and tie should be plain. Most people have memories of an awful waistcoat some relation or other wore to a Christmas lunch. This is not a wedding and the waistcoat should not be fancy. The tie, equally, should not be aimed at drawing attention to itself. If anything the shirt should have the pattern, perhaps a thin stripe, which will also help add width that the waistcoat lacks as opposed to the jacket.
There is one problem with the theory though – most waistcoats are made too short. Originally, all suit trousers sat on a man’s waist (above the hip bones and probably just under the belly button). At this height, the waistcoat and trousers would overlap by at least an inch or so, allowing a man to sit down or stretch without exposing his shirt.

Today, most waistcoats are made at the same length, but trousers are worn closer to the hips. This can create unattractive ballooning out from the waist of the trousers, particularly if the shirt is not particularly fitted.
Some waistcoats are made slightly longer in recognition of this. And while they will never completely correct the problem – as they would have to go down over your bum to overlap the trousers by an inch or more – this is a step in the right direction. I recommend Flight, a company that sells high-quality suit separates in green, blue and grey flannel.
3 Guest Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
• Ruffs, Cuffs and Farthingales (by Winston Chesterfield)
• BespokeMe (by Andrew Williams)
• Smarter Style (by Michael Snytkin)
- Patrick: So difficult to pull off without...
- Náuticos Blancos: I live in a little city...
- Derrik Ollar: Tie widths change with...
- Derrik Ollar: Damn the natives…w...
- Alex: As a regular hat wearer, I must agree...






Since a belt should not be worn with a waistcoat, a man should wear braces under the waistcoat, hidden from view. This will keep the pants at the correct height throughout the day, and keep an unsightly belt buckle from protruding underneath the waistcoat.
Comment by Turling — February 9, 2008 #
Turling,
I don’t think you are right. Braces and belt are irrelevant. It is a question of how high the trousers are cut, not them falling down. No matter what strength your braces, they will not pull up the trousers to your waist if the trousers are cut to a certain length from crotch to hip.
A pair of trousers that fits well should not need either braces or belt anyway.
If you buy trousers that are high enough to fit on your waist then they should fit fine under your waistcoat. The rest of us are still left trying to find a longer-fitting waistcoat.
Comment by Simon Crompton — February 11, 2008 #
I do see your point and I do apologize for not recognizing it in your post. But, yes, the rise on the trousers needs to be sufficient to be able to wear them upon the waist or a longer waistcoat should be employed. The point should be to not show any material between waistcoat and trousers. The suspenders were meant as a means of keeping the pants at the right height throughout the day. Regardless of quality, a belt still must be adjusted as one moves about throughout a day’s activity. Thank you for your reply.
Comment by Turling — February 11, 2008 #